elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009

images Elle Fanning: Critics#39; Choice elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Elle Fanning: #39;New Moon#39;
  • Elle Fanning: #39;New Moon#39;

  • addsf345
    08-20 01:11 PM
    With different employer, you can get 3 years as well, if the new employer has filed for a new PERM and you have received an approved I-140.

    that is logical, but I am asking if I transfer now, which will be a simple H1B transfer - would I get only 6 months.

    I actually received 3 years extension 2 weeks back with same employer, but considering another offer.

    From what you said, it looks like the new employer can not get 3 years extension.:(

    wallpaper Elle Fanning: #39;New Moon#39; elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. may dakotaelle fanning
  • may dakotaelle fanning

  • vga_1977
    04-15 05:23 PM
    Hi hur11

    Please let me know which category you have applied EB2/ EB3. Below is my qualification

    Degree : B.Com ( 3 years)
    PG : M.C.A (IGNOU - 3 Years)
    Experience - 8 Years in India and 3 years in USA with different employer.

    Thanks in Advance


    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Will Dakota Fanning
  • Will Dakota Fanning

  • nixstor
    08-01 04:31 PM

    Can you share your experience on your way to babson? Things like your GMAT Score, How long did you prepare, your work experience etc. Is it a lock step program or you can do it at your convenience? I am looking at Ross's Part time. I havent even started but thats some thing on my mind. I am neither in Ann Arbor area or NE area.


    2011 may dakotaelle fanning elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. dakota fanning 2009, elle
  • dakota fanning 2009, elle

  • getgreensoon1
    04-17 08:23 AM
    If you believe IGNOU or Univ of Pheonix are fraudulent, Please provide proof of this and also report to USCIS.

    Its not purely education that will get you H1 or GC. You also need to be skilled in your field.
    You might look down on certain universities or degrees but in the end employers care more about skill and experience and so does USCIS

    Looks like you are one of the beneficiaries of H1 who does not have good education. You can console yourself with the word 'skill' and all that computer jargon The bottomline is H1B visa is for professionals. However, in the past few years, Indian IT bodyshops have sent underskilled computer operators to the US to enhance their operating margins. This will come to end very soon and has to come to an end very soon. I think the process has already begun. Number of H1b visas rejected at Indian bodyshops have gone up. Operating margins at Infosys has shrunk significantly. Infosys and other bodyshops have seen stock price plummet drastically.

    Companies such as Congizant have stopped bringing people from India on H1. Rather they are trying to hire people in the US who already have H1B visas. The illegals who have gotton their H1B from shady consultants in NJ, CA and elsewhere. Congizant is doing community service by legalizing illegals. The people who sat on the bench during recession while holding their H1B visas without a paycheck. Sorry with paycheck which needs to be refunded to the employer by personal check. Stop the fraud, please stop the fraud.


    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Dakota Fanning and Elle
  • Dakota Fanning and Elle

  • pappu
    10-27 11:14 AM
    I finally get the chance to share our wonderful news with you all. We (me and my wife) received our "Welcome new resident" e-mails this morning.

    11 yrs for me and 12 yrs for my wife since coming to the USA. Between the two of us, Three J1s and Two F1 stamps, Six H1b stamps, Four 140s, 10 EAD/AP (5 each), 3 finger print notices apiece, Four RFEs between us and a total of $68KUSD in total USCIS fees/Lawyer fees and countless gray hair later and after many an emotional roller coaster over the years, it was our turn today.
    For those of you unclear about the admittedly weird above numbers, take a look at my RD. It is not a typo! I often wondered if I was a lone Dinosaur that survived the meteorite. I never saw anyone with a 4 plus year 485 recently.
    Our 485s were 2 yrs old and approvable when the visa bulletin fiasco happened in summer 2007. Ironically I heard that even my FPs/Background check were cleared by then (which in those days was the main cause of delays).

    I made many approaches over the years to the USCIS via phone, email, and fax, My Congressman contacted them on multiple occasions (atleast 3 times when he forwarded their response to me). I finally also wrote the ombudsman 2 weeks ago. I was pretty scathing in that letter as well (about their mockery of their stated FIFO policy etc). I am not sure exactly what worked, or if anything at all did, and it was just my time. After a while dealing with the injustice, you just get numb. Today finally I breathe a deep sigh of relief. The loooooong wait is over.

    I've spent so long waiting I even get nostalgic about the early days. I remember very well, blogging one cold December night on Immigrationportal with Wallenpond, Pdakwala, Superman,Khodalmd and many other early IV luminaries in 2005 putting up a rearguard uncoordinated effort, when Rep. Sensenbrenner scuttled our visa recapture chances in conference committee. Following which IV was born with leadership from folks well known to us now. IV is your organisation and platform. It will only be as strong as you let it be.

    I wish each of you all the best of luck and least agony in your wait. Those of you current, have faith, if you are being wronged, Stand up. Write/meet with those in a position to do something. Advocate for yourself. That way, atleast they know, what is going on. Otherwise none can help you.

    I will continue to stick around here and do what I can to help with IVs efforts. I believe with our overall effort, we are helping ourselves yes, but what we are advocating for is correct for this country as well.

    Best wishes all.

    Congrats. We remember you from the early days of IV and appreciate your continued support to this effort.

    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Dakota Fanning and Elle
  • Dakota Fanning and Elle

  • angelfire76
    10-04 05:49 PM
    It may not be popular here, but IMHO PD porting within the same filing category can be allowed, but not retaining the same PD if you are "upgrading" to another category.
    I remember one person giving an analogy of a queue in a grocery store. I would like to give a different take on it. One express line and another regular line. Lets say the regular line moves real slow and the express line is well express. However the express line slows down, but is not as slow as the regular line. The person waiting in a regular line decides enough is enough, moves to express line (by dumping the items that exceed the express line limit).
    How would the people in the express line react if the person from the regular line tries to "retain" his or her position by cutting into the express line, stating that he/she was before them, but only in a different line?
    If you think logically, that is the case we have here with category interfiling.

    I would recommend some sort of compromise, as its not fair either to ask EB3 people to move to the end of queue, as all said and done they've been able to bargain with their employer to apply for their GC, while we did enjoy a bit in grad school, and came out with a sense of entitlement. :D

    Some intermediary date, lets say determined by a mathematical algorithm (hopefully not designed by gctest) or whatever is deemed to be a fair date. But retaining the original timestamp in the regular queue is unacceptable to those who have qualified for EB2 before the one porting his/her date to EB2.


    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. +and+dakota+fanning+2009
  • +and+dakota+fanning+2009

  • vinabath
    07-10 02:52 PM
    Thanks man!!!, for bringing me in to reality. I thought I can hope and live in dreams atleast for couple of weeks. You are not allowing me do that. You always want me in the reality and be sad that I could not file and angry that USCIS messed it up.

    Special Note: I am already screwed. My heart is already broke. Now nothing, I mean nothing can.

    once significant amount of AOS applns were received - there will be a process to dispatch these rejected applications base don priority date.

    cmon people for uscis everything is a process and all know it takes time
    im not pessimistic, but uscis made me so.

    like others say - dont build hopes unless u see fruit in ur hand. my2c

    2010 Will Dakota Fanning elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Elle Fanning: Critics#39; Choice
  • Elle Fanning: Critics#39; Choice

  • absaarkhan
    08-20 11:37 AM
    It is time to Re-Visit this Issue.
    I am sure lot of People used Advance Parole to enter US.

    I wanted to know if Anybody Successfully DID a H1B Transfer After
    Entering US on Advance Parole??

    I Remember Rajiv Khanna Confirmed that this is Possible.

    But I would like to know first hand experience from the gurus who have done this successfully.


    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Actress Elle Fanning
  • Actress Elle Fanning

  • dr_vroeg
    06-16 09:58 AM
    mette...just read your post...your mean :p

    hair dakota fanning 2009, elle elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. dakota fanning 2009, elle
  • dakota fanning 2009, elle

  • vikbar
    04-08 02:08 PM

    Did it say anything on your online account about RFE when you received the email, or you just got the email i.e. when you click on the receipt number it shows status of the case which usually shows a generic message that the case was received and is pending, so did that message change?

    If not, then did anybody else who got the RFE had that message changed?



    elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Elle Fanning: Young
  • Elle Fanning: Young

  • nrk
    10-29 05:53 PM
    Also for me as well


    Could you please send me the letter that you sent to Sec. NAPOLITANO-. My e-mail address is rongch60@gmail.com.

    Thank you.


    hot Dakota Fanning and Elle elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. To see more of Dakota cheering
  • To see more of Dakota cheering

  • unitednations
    03-31 11:12 AM
    Here is my case trail

    worked with employer A from June 2005 on h1b visa.
    Employer A applied for GC under PERM EB2 with PD - March, 2nd 2006 - labor approved in a couple of weeks
    Employer A applied for i 140 in June 2006 and got approved in July 2006
    Filed for i 485 in July 2008 never received FP notices
    Project got over in last week of February 2008 and unable to find new project.
    I switched jobs in last week of April 2008 using EAD - using AC21
    Sent AC21 letter to USCIS in July 2008 about job change.
    Employer A requested 140 revoke in August 2008.
    Spouse got FP notice in August 2008 whereas I (primary) got NOID asking for new employment details.
    Responded to NOID in a timely manner and on August 25th, 2008 - my status changed to "Response received - case processing resumed"
    In Jan 2009 I got my FP notice.
    In Jan 2009 - I travelled using AP and got back fine.
    In March 2009 - I got a denial notice saying "485 is denied because 140 was revoked on August 2008. No appeal only MTR" - thisletter comes from a different officer id than the one who sent the NOID.

    My question to UN and other gurus. Does it have anything to do with a changed interpretation? My lawyer says "This is a training issue - the new officer did not know about AC21 and as soon as he/she saw 140 as revoked - just ignored your other details on the case and issued a denial notice. This is very common and can be resolved using MTR"

    To me; it looks like it could be a shift in change of policy. In the denial notice; it is the same officer number who sent the notice of intent to deny. Therefore; it is not a training issue; looks like something else is happening.

    training issue is when they send straght denial after 140 is revoked.


    house dakota fanning 2009, elle elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. More Elle Fanning
  • More Elle Fanning

  • pavoniaMan
    04-29 07:55 AM
    Add $100 from me.

    $100 from me too.

    tattoo Dakota Fanning and Elle elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. as Elle Fanning (quot;Dakota#39;s
  • as Elle Fanning (quot;Dakota#39;s

  • anzerraja
    07-20 09:35 AM
    Lately the members of IV have come to know that Aman Kapoor, the co-founder of IV has sold his house and spent around $64000/- towards the administrative costs of IV. This too was brought to our attention from a regular member like you and me, without which this would not have come to our knowledge at all.

    So some of the members have taken an initiative to reimburse Aman and other core IV team members with the expenses they have incurred so far towards the administrative costs of IV. Note that the time they have spent and the sufferings cannot be compensated. Let us do the least by atleast compensating the money. Please do not donate directly to IV funds.

    There is a funding drive in this other thread towards reimbursing the administrative costs of IV.


    Could you please pledge an amount ?

    People, since Aman and lets not forget other core members also who I am sure have racked up a lot of out of pocket cost we as a community should gather funds for administrative cost also. GC is not just Aman's/ pappu/logiclife and others core member's dream...its OUR dream, and its not fair that in spite of knowing the time and money spent by the core members we donot share the burden.
    So here is what I am thinking, there are 21000+ members of which I think 10,000 can be considered the real people (I am sure there are more..but a real conservative estimate) if we all pitch in $10 for administrative cost I think it would not put any dent in our pockets and this collective effort would not create a financial burden on any of the core members.

    Even though IV is not for profit, there is no rule which says that you cannot have funds for administrative cost. In fact one rule of thumb to give to any NOP charitable organization like united way etc is to look at their admin cost. Why not IV have that.
    Any thoughts!

    Lets not make this a core team fight only...people are jumping in the boat and asking all and any question they can..and when it comes to giving money they will say that..oh I cant no money...I am not a rich guy my self but managed to give $200 and now signed up for $50 yesterday...looking at what a lot of people are doing I think I might have to go to $100.


    pictures +and+dakota+fanning+2009 elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Elle+fanning+and+dakota+
  • Elle+fanning+and+dakota+

  • smisachu
    07-31 12:58 PM
    LOL, Sorry about the jargon but it is derivatives, high freq, stat arb and options we are talking about. We can talk about stocks all day and I promise not to use math.:D

    I partially work in the field plus studying too. And I am not in IT so I dont have to worry about product releases etc:D:D

    smisachu and all other gurus above -
    how do you guys manage to do options/commodities/fx trading without missing prod release? :) you all seem to have lot of knowledge about all this stuff and its good to learn something new (although one like me need to google to understand what smisachu is saying :D)
    I invest in stocks and etfs but am very impatient when it comes to maximize profits.. i like to take small small profits (5% to 7%) instead of one big kill.. btw, can someone suggest good REIT etfs? (sorry, not related to original commodities topic)

    dresses To see more of Dakota cheering elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. recalls Elle Fanning, 5.
  • recalls Elle Fanning, 5.

  • vansvenkat
    12-04 01:21 AM
    This suggestion is very good,There should be some fee to get access( to generate money).

    how about breaking this into multiple levels.

    (1) account maintenance fee: charge $1/month for maintaining the account, members who paid this fee will have read access to all threads except IV core updates. IV can generate $25K a month with this option, this can cover day to day expenses.

    (2) usage fee: charge $??/month for using the IV forums, members who paid this free can post and respond and read IV updates.


    makeup Actress Elle Fanning elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. dakota fanning 2009, elle
  • dakota fanning 2009, elle

  • ilikekilo
    04-09 01:57 PM

    I know it is a weird question. But I'd still go ahead and ask it.

    What documents that USCIS expects for a scenario like this?

    My situation: My wife still hasn't weaned off nursing completely.
    My child is 1 year 3 months old. My wife got an RFE for TB test.
    Plus she is in India currently.

    Would sending the birth certificate of child be enough to prove the existence of 1 yr 3 month old child? OR would USCIS requires doctors's input also? O do they require anything else to prove baby is still being nursed.?

    Thansk for your response,

    i will go ahead and give my take on this based on my experience

    1) some doctors DO NOT give a waiver since they think its OK to take a TB test during pregnancy itself, let alone not taking after child birth. so call the doc b4 you go.
    2) I believe as long as the doctor gives you a blanket waiver it should be fine, thats all the proof you probably mifght need..

    I dont think USCIS is so crude to go into getting excruciating evidence in these type of situations...good luck;)

    I would call the USCIS if first off , they could give you more time..saying that she is traveling....if not get a blanker waiver..

    girlfriend as Elle Fanning (quot;Dakota#39;s elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Elle Fanning was submitted for
  • Elle Fanning was submitted for

  • unitednations
    03-31 11:09 AM
    So do you think they are going after AC21 folks as a scapegoat? I spoke to few people on this including lawyers and they say that "denials on 485" when 140 gets revoked is a common thing and usually the officer who issues the denial letter does not check and verify to see other details. Thats why they have to go through the MTR process.

    That was the case when uscis would send straight denial and then person would do mtr with ac21.

    the OP and the particular case I am talking about; they responded to the notice of intent to deny (NOID specifcally said person may be elgiible for ac21 and to give job letter, etc.); however they denied it after the response was sent. It would be different story if they denied due to job mismatching. However, that was not the case. They denied stating the 140 was revoked. Basically, this is a new type of denial and may be a shift in how uscis is doing things.

    I spoke to candidate earlier and he talked to the original 140 company. They told him that their h-1b's aren't getting approved (common issue right now with vermont service center for just about everyone) and that in the clean up they revoked almost 70 I-140's for people who had left. He doesn't know if it was in response to an I-140 query or not (uscis adds up cases frequently in rfe's on the 140). When companies revoke 140 to a RFE; USCIS could be making a determination that the 140's company is now revoking were approved iun error and people are not eligible for ac21. Now; if this was the case; uscis officer should have put this in the denial but they did not.

    I'll keep everyone posted of what happens to this case.

    hairstyles Elle Fanning: Young elle fanning and dakota fanning 2009. Mary Elle Fanning, born April
  • Mary Elle Fanning, born April

  • lazycis
    11-23 01:48 PM
    nc pending sept/2004

    File a lawsuit against the USCIS.

    04-20 05:02 PM
    We are all here for personal interests...:D

    Even if I agree, it doesn't account for the fact why some are uncivil and abusive, and others are not.

    01-30 09:52 AM
    Though most people here would want retroactive action, I think such a rule will only be applicable for applicants based on a cut off date that will be a future date.

    Thats how all laws have been in past.

    This is something that is most unwelcome by employers and lawyers and thats why this may have opposition. Especially those consulting companies that thrive on these things.